One of Michael Salla's favourite "whistleblowers" is a guy named Stephen Lovekin. Lovekin was one of Steven Greer's Disclosure witnesses, and will be appearing at Salla's June 2006 Extraterrestrial Civilization & World Peace Conference. Here is what Salla says about Lovekin:
"Brig. General Stephen Lovekin who testified in the Disclosure Project also had important things to share about the Eisenhower administration's loss of control over ET affairs."
So - is Stephen Lovekin an important whistleblower (i.e. a former Brigadier General who had the ear of President Eisenhower and claims to have heard about ET matters while in the White House), or is he just another Corso-esque phoney).
Kevin Randle has looked into this question, and concluded that Lovekin is just another Corso. After looking into Lovekin's military background, Kevin states:
"There is no corroboration of his many claims of military service as a high-ranking officer, no verification of his positions in the White House and little reason to believe he was witness to the things he claims. Like so many of the other whistle blowers, he should be removed from our lists."
If for some reason that I cannot fathom you are thinking of attending Salla's conference, you might want to check out Kevin's research on Lovekin.
It will be interesting to see what the response is from the exopolitics crowd, and whether they can provide solid support for Lovekin's claims, which have clearly been called into question.
Paul Kimball
4 comments:
Is this comment going to be shown?
I mean, of course no information is available from people that work on top secret areas. Man, that is pretty obvious; you don´t need to think as Gregory Perelman to solve that mistery. Even in Rambo III when he wanted to rescue his friend a goverment personel said to him that they´ll will deny his participation if he gets caught. Rambo answered him: "I´m used to that".
What matters here is that when the river is flowing, this type of walls that seems to be payd $$$ by the goverment to erase footsteps or finger prints still show a bad intention to the common opinion
Evidence surrounds us, without Corso, Cooper, Lovekin, Hare, etc. There are millions of videos know available. So if your argument against the evidence that we are not alone in the universe, that the US Goverment is not lying by hidin info to the public is tha Lovekin has "no military background" is so poor that just shows that you work is not good by satanize this old men.
I hope my comment can be available; but if not it´ll confirm my doubts.
Greetings.
1. Yes, your comment was published. I don't censor people who disagree with me, so long as they are respectful.
2. Having said that, it doesn't mean I agree with your opinion, because I don't. True believers always claim to want "the truth" but only if it is the "truth" you already believe in. That's not critical thinking; that's a religion.
PK
He may be in fact a fraud but he's not the only one whose come forward. Why zero in on him alone and then conclude because only his account is questionable, then everything else and everyone else accounts must be false.
The fact is we are not alone in this vast universe and once you grasp how infinitely large the universe is then it would be quite arrogant to believe we are the only ones in it.
Post a Comment