Well-said.Even so, a skeptic *can* be a debunker -- but only if the phenomenon in question *is* bunk!I think the "debunkers" Randle speaks of need a new name: "psuedoskeptics."
Mac:I go with "fundamentalist debunkers" to differentiate them from legitimate debunkers, i.e. the ones who debunk bunk.Paul
Post a Comment
2 comments:
Well-said.
Even so, a skeptic *can* be a debunker -- but only if the phenomenon in question *is* bunk!
I think the "debunkers" Randle speaks of need a new name: "psuedoskeptics."
Mac:
I go with "fundamentalist debunkers" to differentiate them from legitimate debunkers, i.e. the ones who debunk bunk.
Paul
Post a Comment